Application

Cooler ESP of a cement plant in Vietnam

Problem

1.Dust build-up was observed on inlet Gas Distribution (GD) Screen, Collecting Electrode (CE) and Discharge Electrode (DE), which led to high sparking during operation.

2.Discharge Electrodes were damaged and broken, which caused short-circuit.

3.Customer expected to reduce their emission from 60mg/Nm3 to less than 20mg/Nm3.

Solution

Tai & Chyun recommended replacing CE and DE for 2 fields as well as upgrading  Conventional T/R into High Frequency T/R for the 1st and 2nd field. In addition, maintenance and supervision were also performed during the outage. The installation was completed within 25 days as below work scope:

1.Replacing Collecting Electrodes and Discharge Electrodes for the 2nd and 3rd field.

Bent old CE
Bent old CE
Hardened dust built-up on old RDE
Hardened dust built-up on old RDE
Stabilizing bar and traverse installation
Stabilizing bar and traverse installation
New CE installation
New CE installation
New RDE installation
New RDE installation
DE clip installation
DE clip installation

2.Installing new GD screen at ESP inlet.

Dust-coated and blocked inlet GD screen
Dust-coated and blocked inlet GD screen
New GD screen

3.Upgrading into new High Frequency T/R for the 1st and 2nd field.

Old T/R dismantlement
Old T/R dismantlement
Old Conventional T/R
Support for new High Frequency T/R
Support for new High Frequency T/R
New High Frequency T/R
New High Frequency T/R

Benefit

New RDE and maintenance recovered ESP performance. With High Frequency T/R upgrade, ESP collection efficiency increased and reached the emission reduction target of less than 20mg/Nm3. Meanwhile, the gas volume also increased with comparison to that before the overhaul and thus exceeded customer expectation.

March 2018 May 2019
Gas volume m3/h 324,000 414,000
Production capacity T/D 4000 4339
Emission mg/Nm3 60 15
Emission result from CCR showed 15mg/Nm3
Emission result from CCR showed 15mg/Nm3

Result from electrical readings also showed significant improvement in power output, which is increased secondary voltage (kV) and secondary current (mA). As shown in the below tables, ESP could only operate at low power output due to heavy sparking before the overhaul. After the upgrade, ESP could produce more power output indicating ESP dust collection efficiency also increased.

Before Retrofit (Oct 2018)

Field 1 Field 2 Field 3
kVmean 11 18 44
mA 30-40 25-40 50-70

After Retrofit (May 2019)

Field 1 Field 2 Field 3
kVmean 31 32 24
mA 60-80 140-170 130-170